Posts

Taking a Stand Against Starvation, Forced Relocation and Murder Can Get You Fired From Google

  So much for "do no evil":  Google has fired more than two dozen employees who protested this week against the company’s cloud computing contract with the Israeli government. The workers were dismissed after an investigation found that they had staged protests inside Google’s offices in New York and Sunnyvale, California. In Sunnyvale, they entered the office of Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian, according to a post on X by the group that organized the demonstration, No Tech For Apartheid. Protesters held banners that read “No More Genocide For Profit” and “We Stand with Palestinian, Arab and Muslim Googlers.” A Google spokesperson told CNN Thursday that the protests “were part of a long-standing campaign by a group of organizations and people who largely don’t work” at the company. “A small number of employee protesters entered and disrupted a few of our locations. Physically impeding other employees’ work and preventing them from accessing our facilities is a clear violation

Police React Violently to Pro-Palestinian Protestors At Columbia University

Image
 

Three Short Videos That Can Help Explain The Recent Iran-Israel Conflict

Image
 First if all, Iran's attack was not unprovoked: Second: The impact of Iran's attack has been misinterpreted by the American/Western media: Third: The reason Israel wants to rattle Iran's cage is because they failed their Gaza operation: In short: Israel did this to themselves, and their leader would rather start WWIII than embrace peace or admit defeat. 

US Supreme Court Rules That Protest Organizers Are Liable For ANY HARM Done By Those Who Attend

Image
 Does it matter if it is " a participant, counter-protester or random yahoo ?" Nope! Due Dissidence has more:

Former UK Leader's Hypocrisy Exposed

Image
  Notice he talks about "the scale;" a lot of publications have used "unprecedented" to describe Iran's retaliatory attack.

The Intercept: New York Times Memo Reveals What Journalists Aren't Allowed To Talk About

 The newspaper that went after Harvey Weinstein crumbles in the face of AIPAC and Benjamin Netanyahu: THE NEW YORK TIMES instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept. The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees. The memo — written by Times standards editor Susan Wessling, international editor Philip Pan, and their deputies — “offers guidance about some terms and other issues we have grappled with

Rachel Blevins Talks to Marwa Osman About The Background Of Iran's Retaliatory Attack

Image
 Did you know that Iran was willing not to send any drones/rockets if Israel had stopped the Gaza genocide?

How Strong Is Iran?

Image
 Jimmy Dore and Scott Ritter discuss: Long Story = Short: Israel needs to make peace. Also, if the US wants to "win" any military conflicts going forward, nuclear options would need to be on the table...and that's pretty much the endgame.

Al-Jazeera: What Happens Next?

Image
 In regards to Iran's attack: