Welcome to The Now

 As stated here before, the more radical element of the American Left is willing to have temporary alliances in order to achieve specific goals. While I still believe that the left in America needs to get its own house in order, smearing and lying about those on the Left who participated helps no one but those who enjoy the boons of the status quo: 

  As mentioned earlier , the disagreements on the American Left is not just between Revolutionaries and Reformists. Even in the Revolutionary camp, their are "Radicals" and the "Refined." This is becoming more clear with this interview/exchange between Sabby Sabbs and WSWS journalist Eric London:

 When it comes to making substantial political change, you need numbers. Anyone who is frustrated with the status quo and wishes to change it should understand this, and many do. The question is: "How to get those numbers?" What is the best way to get enough people to rally against the system? At one point, it seemed that most of the American Left was divided into two factions: Reformists and (more radical) Revolutionaries. The former basically believes in working with and/or in the system in order to change it, where the latter prefers a more outsider, non-electoral politics approach. Of course, there's room for hybrids (i.e., ignore national politics and focus on the local). Currently, the best way to discern between the two is by what you see on cable news or in the halls of government: if they are on TV or radio denouncing the status quo, odds are they are reformists; anyone going the extra step of including the current two major parties in their critique are rarely h...

 While Status Coup has discovered some interesting  things regarding the party started by Nick Brana, The World Socialist Web Site called it (meaning MPP chances of success) back in 2020 : The MPP is an example of the type of formation produced by an extremely low level of political consciousness. It is somewhat difficult to comment on because it is not a serious organization. The term “party” is purely nominal. A party is based on a common program, a common assessment of historical experiences, and a common perspective . The MPP has none of these. It does not understand the past, it has nothing to offer for the present, and it has no future . What predominated among the eclectic combination of individuals, celebrities and media personalities brought together on August 30 was unseriousness, pessimism and a fair amount of dishonesty. The dominant line, however, was provided by those in and around the Democratic Party.  The article is definitely worth the read. That said, ...